What’s in a name?

We list people on the site by their professional name (stage name, best-known public name, what have you) and this, obviously, isn’t necessarily their real name. If you happen to find out someone’s real name, please don’t try to change their name on the site with a “name correction”. Instead add it as their “birth name” under Biographical Information.

And while we’re on the subject of names, one of the many fun things that the Interwebz have taught us is that very few of us have unique names. Please be careful when you spot that Ethel Doofenshmirtz was the costume designer on a French film made in 1930 that she really is the same Ethel Doofenshmirtz that we have listed. Take a quick look at her page – if her credits are as a stunt performer in American films in the 1990s, the chances are very high that it’s a completely different woman, no matter how rare the name. We have tools that can help us spot these anomalies, but you can help us greatly by having a quick delve and seeing if you can resolve the complication yourself.

No Comments

URLs for external reviews – TV series

If you’re sending us links to reviews of TV series, please remember to send them to the right place.

  • if the review is of an individual episode, send the update from that episode’s title page
  • if the review is of a whole season, or of the entire series, please send it from the main title page for the series

No Comments

Movie Connections – top tip

Please take a look at the Movie-Connections (movie-links) guidelines for how to connect a series of
movies.

If you have Movie A and it has two follow-ups, you may think it is correct to
just add those two movies to Movie A with “followed by” connections.  That
would be incorrect.  What you would end up with would be:

Movie A followed by Movie B
Movie A followed by Movie C

On the site, Movie A and Movie B would be connected, and Movie A and Movie C
would be connected, but Movie B would not be connected to Movie C.

The correct way to submit the connections is to go to the page for Movie A and
submit that is is followed by Movie B. Then go to the page for Movie B and
submit that it is followed by Movie C.  What you would end up with is:

Movie A followed by Movie B
Movie B followed by Movie C

Our software will automatically make the connection between
Movie A and Movie C.

Think of a series of connected movies like links of a chain, each one
following the previous one.

The submission guide can help answer questions, and many experienced people
are available to help on the contributors help message board.

LINKS
submission guide
contributors help

No Comments

Links to YouTube clips on name pages

Are you submitting links to YouTube clips of yourself for your name page? Rather than sending in links to loads of individual clips, it would be much easier for other users to find stuff if you collect all your clips together onto one YouTube channel and send us the link to that instead.

No Comments

Color info

It’s perfectly fine to add an attribute to note the color process used.  Common examples are:

  • (Metrocolor)
  • (Eastmancolor)
  • (Fujicolor)
  • (Technicolor)

But please note that Technicolor was only a process until the mid-70s, after which they only processed Eastman/Kodak, so these should go to the technical list.

A mistake we often see is to add the name of the film laboratory as an attribute in the Color Info list.  These should go to the technical list. Common examples of labs would be DeLuxe, Rank and Movielab.

Also note that in most cases we don’t accept episode level color data except where special episodes are different from the rest of the series.

No Comments

Spelling

We recently noticed that for a good long while we’ve been spelling the abbreviation of “microphone” as “mike” instead of the more commonly used “mic” in the pull-down menu for goof submissions. From 14 January 2010 it will be changed. For reasons of consistency, you understand.

Happy New Year

That is all.

No Comments

Top 200 Contributors for 2009

This is a quick note to announce the top 200 data contributors to IMDb for 2009. The list and more details have just been posted on the IMDb message boards — thanks and Happy New Year from everyone at IMDb!

No Comments

Happy Holidays

Thanks for all your contributions throughout 2009. We’ll be operating with a reduced staff over the Christmas and New Year period so it might take longer than usual for us to check and approve your submissions. Please bear with us – we’ll all be back in 2010 full of vim, vigour and far too much festive food.

No Comments

And the winner is…

Here’s a note from our Awards manager, Oliver, on the correct way to enter the ranking for an Awards submission:

Ranking of Awards

A quite common misunderstanding related to awards data is that of the ranking to be submitted.

Quite frequently awards are submitted this way

Title: Forbach (2008)

Name: Burger, Claire

Event: Côté Court Festival

Award: Special Jury Award

Category: Best Short Film

Year: 2009

Rank: 2

Title: Tira Bakal (2009)

Name: Wurth, Scott (I)

Event: Rhode Island International Film Festival

Award: Second Prize

Category: Best Documentary Short

Year: 2009

Rank: 2

This is wrong since here the ’2′ has been used to indicate the second best ranking at the overall event. However the ranking information we need relates to the “award”, not to the “event”.

Let’s put those two above examples into words:

Claire Burger’s film Forbach (2008) has won the second place Special Jury Award in the category Best Short Film at the 2009 Côté Court Festival…

very likely not what the submitter wanted to say.

Scott Wurth’s film Tira Bakal (2009) has won the second place Second Prize in the category Best Documentary Short at the 2009 Rhode Island International Film Festival… again very likely not what the submitter wanted to say.

Both films have actually won their respective awards, they did not rank second place. The actual awards the films have won may or may not have the status of “second best” overall at those events, e.g. the Special Jury Award at the Côté Court Festival is the second best award which can be won overall at the event.

Nevertheless if the film wins the Special Jury Award, you should indicate that by putting a ’1′ into the ranking field of the submission form.

Let’s look at another example:

Title: The Woman of Ahhs (2008)

Name: Paquette, B.P.

Event: Mexico International Film Festival

Award: Bronze Palm Award

Category: Feature

Year: 2009

Rank: 3

This submission has the same problem, just here it is the third best overall award since there also is a Silver Palm and a Golden Palm to be won.

The above would be correct only and only if the festival’s listing of winners would say:

Bronze Palm – Feature category

1. place: This Film

2. place: That Film

3. place: The Woman of Ahhs

However it says

Bronze Palm – Feature category

* This Film

* That Film

* The Woman of Ahhs

There is no ranking at all for the Bronze Palm.

Summary:

The ’2′ and ’3′ for the ranking of an award are somewhat rare exceptions. If a film or person actually has won an award, the ’1′ should be used to indicate that.

The same goes for Special Mentions, Special Recognitions and the like as there are no rankings at all for those. ’1′ should be used to indicate those were won.

If the award itself has no rankings, please always use ’1′ to indicate a win.

No Comments

Cast Attributes

This is just by way of being a quick reminder that we only allow a small number of “attributes” (the qualifying bit in parentheses) for cast credits.

Acceptable attributes for cast credits are:

  • (uncredited)
  • (credit only)
  • (archive footage)
  • (archive sound)
  • (singing voice)
  • (unconfirmed)
  • (rumored)
  • (scenes deleted)
  • (as ……)
  • (also as …..)
  • (voice)
  • (voice:  <language> version) – Where language is simply the name of the language in question, eg Japanese/English/German etc.

We no longer accept any other (attributes) for cast entries so things like these should not be used:

  • Attached
  • In Negotiations
  • In Talks
  • Guest Star
  • Any standalone date, i.e. (2009)
  • Any date range, i.e. (1998-2001)
  • Any TV series info, i.e (Season 8, 9 and 10)

No Comments

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.2, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.