Contribution ideas – plots and episode data

If you’ve a hankering to submit some data but don’t have a specific project in mind, we could really use some help in filling in the holes in our TV episode data.

We’ve a list in the Contributors Zone which shows TV series with missing stuff (plots, cast, crew, episode titles, etc, etc). So if you happen to be a fan and have any of those series on DVD, that’s where to find out what’s missing.

If you’re a keen plot submitter (or would like to be), try this list of popular titles with no plot information. We need plot outlines (two lines to give a flavour of the episode – the sort of thing you’d see in a TV listings magazine), plot summaries (a paragraph giving a more detailed idea of the plot but with no spoilers – the sort of thing you might want to read if you couldn’t make up your mind whether to watch), and plot synopses (ideally a complete scene-by-scene description of everything that happens).

No Comments

Soundtracks (uncredited)

The manager of the Soundtracks section of the database would like remind the contributors to that area of our rules regarding the credited and uncredited use of songs/music.

Many theatrical releases in the last 30 years have credited (on screen) the use of songs in the film.  However, most television programs and early films do not.

There are many different forms a soundtrack entry can take, but for this we will only talk about a straight uncredited situation.  A song is heard, but nothing about that song is credited on-screen.  In these cases, you need to use the (uncredited) attribute after the song name.

“Song Name” (uncredited)
Written by …

The submission guide can help answer questions, and many experienced people are available to help on the contributors help message board.

Tim

No Comments

“Doctor Who” (2005) Specials

We’ve talked about this a lot, and because we don’t yet have a way of listing multiple “specials” in any kind of, as it were, “special” way, we’re going to move the special episodes that fall between seasons 4 and 5 from season 4 (where they are now) and put them, at least for now, into the “unknown” season until we can find a more suitable home for them (we’re working on some ideas).

Although the BBC production codes link them to Season 4, we don’t list special episodes this way and it’s worth noting that the BBC website also lists them in their own “specials” section rather than as part of season 4.

Any questions or comments to the Contributors Help thread, please.

No Comments

Episodes that are submitted without episode numbers…

Episodes that are submitted without episode numbers are automatically shown as being from an “unknown season”. Moving an episode to the correct season is easy: click on the gold Update button at the bottom of the page, scroll down to the Other Corrections section at the bottom of the page and select Correct from the pull-down beside Episode Title / Number. Once the correction has been approved by our editors, the episode will move to the correct season.

No Comments

No Comments

We’ve not quite decided yet whether to post your comments here but for now we’re keeping this blog as a one-way thing and all ongoing discussions/comments/hearty praise/brickbats should go to the Contributors Help message board. For other information about the site or your account, try the Help pages.

No Comments

End of Article Swapping, The (2009)

We’re about to make a behind-the-scenes change to the way we store titles which, to be honest, most users won’t notice but which will affect some submitters.

For years we’ve followed the standard practice of moving articles (the, a, an, etc) to the end of titles when we store them in the database. So, for instance, The Godfather (1972) has been stored as Godfather, The (1972) since… well, since forever. We even used to display it like that, although astute users will have spotted that we now swap the articles back into place for display (but only for titles in English). The advantage of all this article swapping is that it makes it easier to sort titles alphabetically but the disadvantages, especially when dealing with non-English titles, are many and varied.

The time has come, we’ve decided, to bite the bullet and store titles as written.

Little will change on the site because we display English language titles “naturally” anyway but it will make a difference in some places:

  • submissions - if you refer to a title in a submission (including submitting a new title) you will now need to enter it in its “natural” form rather than swapping the article. For the majority of submitters this should be more intuitive and more straightforward.
  • display - Non-English titles will display properly, so that, for instance, Buono, il brutto, il cattivo., Il (1966) will become  Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo. (1966) and Boot – The Making of, Das (1981) will be stored and displayed as Das Boot – The Making of (1981) just as nature intended.
  • “browse” pages – we don’t sort titles alphabetically in many places, but where we do (the various Browse pages or MyMovies, for instance) The Godfather (1972) will now be sorted under T and Il Buono, il brutto, il cattivo. (1966) under I.
  • ftp files – if you download our list files from the ftp server you need to be aware that the sort order of the titles will change in case this affects the way you use them.

The change will affect around 10% of the 1.3 million titles in the database and we’re hoping to make the swap during the day on Tuesday 7 April so that they’ll be visible on the site when the new version is published on Wednesday 8 April.

No Comments

Marriages, Civil Unions, etc

A little while ago we made a slight policy change in the Spouse section of our name pages. Previously we only recorded details of “marriage” in the commonly understood, old fashioned sense, but we are now accepting all legally recognized partnerships (marriages, civil partnerships, domestic unions, etc – the exact terms vary by jurisdiction). The submission guide has been updated to reflect this change but the gist is: if it’s legal, we’ll record it; if it’s not formally recognized by the local authorities, we’ll take it as a biographical trivia item.

No Comments

A Belated Welcome

I’d intended to post a “hello and welcome to the new blog” a little while ago but events overtook me and we had to get the news out about the change in cast order. But here we are now. Hello.

We’re still deciding exactly how we want to use the blog (and we may never properly decide – I have a feeling it’ll just sort of evolve as we post stuff), but we’re hoping it will be a useful way of passing on news from the data team.

This week there’s encouraging stuff from the biographies manager who’s especially pleased to be receiving quite a bit of stuff about various actors’ theatre work which fits nicely into the “other works” section on the bio pages (take a look at Kevin Spacey, for instance). On the downside, he also says he’s been getting quite a few dates of birth without a country, (particularly noticeable, he says, when it’s the USA) and asks you not to forget to include the country with the place of birth.

I’ve not heard from any other list managers, so I’m assuming they’re either blissfully content or so busy that they haven’t got time to talk to the likes of me.

Cheerio for now

No Comments

Change in Display Order of Cast Credits for Recently Completely Titles

We’ve changed the order in which we display the cast for recently completed titles.

We noticed that sometimes we were getting some weird cast lists for forthcoming titles if we used the “credit order” number but didn’t have order information for all the cast. So, for instance, we might know that Actress X was 5th in the list, and Actor Y was 27th but have no idea where anyone else should be sorted. If we sorted them using the order number we’d have Actress X first, Actor Y second and then the rest of the cast in STARMeter order. This, as we say, sometimes looked a little odd.

So, for recently completed titles, where less than 30% of the listed credited cast have order numbers, the Cast Filmography will be ordered by STARMeter.

An example of a title now displaying the cast order following this change is Angels & Demons (2009).

As more information comes in about the credit order we’ll eventually reach the 30% point and we’ll switch back to “cast in credit order”.

The IMDb Team

No Comments

Welcome to the IMDb Contributors Blog

We’ll keep you informed about changes to IMDb and contribution policies and technologies.

– The IMDb List Editors

No Comments

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.2, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.